Mark Aba
The Action Democratic Party (ADP) has dismissed allegations that its National Chairman, Engr. Yabagi Yusuf Sani, is unlawfully serving a third term, insisting that his tenure must be assessed in line with the relevant provisions of the party’s constitution.
The party described the allegation as misleading, arguing that those behind the claim had selectively relied on Article 45.1(a) of the ADP Constitution while ignoring provisions governing the timing and commencement of elective National Conventions under Article 20.2 of the 2026 Constitution.
In an official statement issued on Sunday in Abuja and signed by its National Publicity Secretary, Dr. Sani Dawop, the party explained that Article 20.2(a) provides for non-elective National Conventions every two years during the first four years following the party’s registration and subsequently every two years.
It added that elective National Conventions are to hold every four years after the initial four-year period following the party’s registration.
The ADP also cited Article 20.2(b), which stipulates that such meetings must take place within the same month as the preceding convention or not later than four months afterwards.
According to the party, “these provisions are essential to understanding its constitutional electoral cycle. The distinction between the initial period after registration and commencement of the regular elective convention cycle must be considered when determining the tenure of national officers.
“It maintained that Article 45.1(a), which provides for a four-year tenure renewable once, must be interpreted alongside Article 20.2 and the party’s applicable transitional arrangements and electoral records.”
The party further argued that the fact that Sani has served as its pioneer National Chairman since its establishment in 2017 does not, in itself, establish that he is unlawfully occupying the position for a third term.
The ADP recalled that its National Convention held on May 29 and 30, 2026, renewed its national leadership, insisting that the constitutional validity of the exercise must be determined by examining the relevant constitutional provisions and official convention records.
It said questions surrounding the tenure of party officials should be addressed through its lawful organs, authentic constitutional documents and verifiable electoral records rather than political claims.
The party consequently rejected attempts to portray what it described as a disputed interpretation of its constitution as an established violation.
It reaffirmed its commitment to constitutional supremacy, internal democracy, due process and accountable leadership.
About the Author
